The anxiously awaited ASP.NET Core RC2 has finally landed and with it we have a shiny new tag helper to explorer.
We previously talked about the Cache Tag Helper and how it allows you to cache the output from any section of a Razor page. While the Cache Tag Helper is powerful and very useful, it is limited in that it uses an instance of IMemoryCache
which stores cache entries in memory in the local process. If the server process restarts for some reason, the contents of the cache will be post. Also, if your deployment consists of multiple servers, each server would have its own cache, each potentially containing different contents.
Distributed Cache Tag Helper
The cache tag helper left people wanting more. Specifically they wanted to store the cached HTML in a distributed cache like Redis. Instead of complicating the existing Cache Tag Helper, the ASP.NET team enabled this use-case by adding a new Distributed Cache Tag Helper.
Using the Distributed Cache Tag Helper is very similar to using the Cache Tag Helper:
<distributed-cache name="MyCache"> |
The name property is required and the value should be unique. It is used as a prefix for the cache key. This differs from the Cache Tag Helper which uses an automatically generated unique id based on the location of the cache tag helper in your Razor page. The auto generated approach cannot be used with a distributed cache because Razor would generate different unique ids for each server. You will need to make sure that you use a unique name
each time you use the distributed-cache
tag helper. If you unintentionally use the same name in multiple places, you might get the same results in 2 places.
For example, see what happens when 2 distributed-cache
tag helpers with the same name
:
<distributed-cache name="MyCache"> |
If you are really curious about the how cache keys are generated for both tag helpers, take a look at the CacheTagKey Class.
The vary-by-*
and expires-*
attributes all work the same as the Cache Tag Helper. You can review those in my previous post.
Configuring the Distributed Cache
Unless you specify some additional configuration, the distributed cache tag helper actually uses a local process in memory cache. This might seem a little strange but it does help with the developer workflow. As a developer, I don’t need to worry about standing up a distributed cache like Redis just to run the app locally. The intention of course is that a true distributed cache would be used in a staging/production environments.
The simplest approach to configuring the distributed cache tag helper is to configure a IDistributedCache
service in the Startup class. ASP.NET Core ships with 2 distributed cache implementations out of the box: SqlServer and Redis.
As a simple test, let’s try specifying a SqlServerCache
in the Startup.ConfigureServices
method:
services.AddSingleton<IDistributedCache>(serviceProvider => |
Of course, the ConnectionString should be stored in a configuration file but for demonstration purposes I have in-lined it here.
You will need to create the database and table manually. Here is a script for creating the table, which I extracted from here:
CREATE TABLE MyAppCache( |
Now when I visit the page that contains the distributed-cache
tag helper, I get the following error:
InvalidOperationException: Either absolute or sliding expiration needs to be provided.
The SQL Server implementation requires us to specify some form of expiry. No problem, let’s just add the those attributes to the tag helper:
<distributed-cache name="MyCacheItem1" expires-after="TimeSpan.FromHours(1)"> |
Now the page renders properly and we can see the contents in SQL Server:
Note that since the key is hashed and the value is stored in binary, the contents of the table in SQL server are not human readable.
For more details on working with a SQL Server or Redis distrubted cache, see the official ASP.NET Docs;
Even more configuration
In some cases, you might want more control over how values are serialized or even how the distributed cache is used by the tag helper. In those cases, you could implement your own IDistributedCacheTagHelperFormatter and/or IDistributedCacheTagHelperStorage.
In cases where you need complete control, you could implement your own IDistributedCacheTagHelperService.
I suspect that this added level of customization won’t be needed by most people.
Conclusion
The Distributed Cache Tag Helper provides an easy path to caching HTML fragments in a distributed cache. Out of the box, Redis and SQL Server are supported. Over time, I expect that a number of alternative distributed cache implementations will be provided by the community.